What was the independent variable in the Stanford Prison Experiment?
Likewise, people ask, what are the independent and dependent variables that Zimbardo was examining?
PROCEDURE (METHOD): The study is usually described as an experiment with the independent variable being the conditions the participants are randomly allocated to: either prisoner or guard. The dependent variable is the resulting behaviour.
Also Know, what are the ethical issues in the Stanford Prison Experiment? The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being 'arrested' at home.
In this way, what was the hypothesis of the Stanford Prison Experiment?
August 14, 1971, Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford professor, starts what is planned to be a two week psychological experiment on the relationship between prisoners and their guards. The hypothesis is that the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards are the chief cause of abusive behavior in prison.
What was the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment?
A: The purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment.
Why did Zimbardo stop the experiment?
On August 20, 1971, Zimbardo announced the end of the experiment to the participants. This, according to Zimbardo, was intended to diminish the prisoners' individuality. With no control, prisoners learned they had little effect on what happened to them, ultimately causing them to stop responding, and give up.How did the guards break the solidarity of the prisoners?
6. How did the guards break the solidarity of the prisoners? The aim of breaking the solidarity of the prisoners was accomplished by retaliating once prisoner's rebellion by inflicting torture on the other prisoner's, which thus caused a breach in the union of the prisoners.Why is Stanford experiment unethical?
So with all this said, I believe that Zimbardo's prison experiment is unethical due to its lack of informative material, lack of protection to the prisoners/guards, poor debriefing of the prisoners and poor training of the guards, and the lead experimenter being a large influencing role in the experiment.How much did the Stanford prisoners get paid?
The experiment was led by professor Philip Zimbardo, then in his late 30s. He and his team recruited 24 male students, who were randomly divided into two groups: prisoners and guards. The students were told they would be paid $15 a day and that the experiment would run for two weeks.ncG1vNJzZmiemaOxorrYmqWsr5Wne6S7zGiuoZmkYsSiv4ytn55lmaOxprzEp5uepqRiw6K%2ByJqZpZ1dnrtuwMeeZKyskaOzsL7DZqeroaOku26x16mcq6Gdmru1